Opinions
Common sense: SAT works, but not everyone can win
By Charlie Szold on 4/14/08
|
Providence College made news a while back because it's are one of the first top-tier schools to have stopped requiring SAT scores. My question is why? Is it because it's not fair to those who don't test well? Isn't that really just punishing those who do test well? I had believed that the point of requiring the SAT was to ensure that the students a college accepts are well-rounded. They asked for the GPA to check if you had a work ethic, and then they checked the SAT to test your basic reasoning skills.
And you know what else? The SAT works. I scored very poorly on the math section of my SAT because I'm not very good at math, and I was too lazy to try and do better. I have to live with that, and I had to deal with the consequences. If a person scores poorly on the verbal section because he or she watched MTV instead of picking up a book, then so be it. Those who are going to college know the game and know the rules, so it is up to them to find their way. Why should a college have to change their criteria to cater to anyone?
Like it or not, we live in a capitalist society. The cream is supposed to rise to the top. Rather than pretend we are all cream with phony standards, let's work on making it a truth. I believe that helping hands should be offered. If people want to improve themselves, there should be a way for it to happen. I was lucky enough to be able to afford an SAT math tutor who increased my score 90 points, opening up a whole new range of options that never seemed possible. Everyone should have that chance. Equality of opportunity, not of outcome, is what we should be working toward.
I have realized that I could never be an engineer, despite a rather astute eye for design, simply because I could never do the calculations necessary. And despite the many times I have wished upon a shooting star, and the incalculable amount of quarters I donated to wishing wells across the country, I will never play Major League Baseball. "Why me?" I ask myself sometimes - I had the talent, I had the drive - but it isn't true. Thousands of kids worked harder and wanted it more, and that's why I won't get what I want - and more likely than not, neither will they. This is a hard fact of American culture: You have to work hard, really hard, to win. Nothing is handed to you, and we shouldn't work to change that. Success will be when this country offers its people a way to achieve great things without cheapening the standards. Until we do that, we can only be content to imagine our own equalities and allow our weaknesses to flourish.
Charlie Szold is a freshman in the School of Public Affairs and a conservative columnist for The Eagle.
2008 Woodie Awards


Viewing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
Jane Vaccaro
posted 4/14/08 @ 12:26 PM EST
As a teacher and a parent, I always felt that your generation was growing up with unrealistic view of their own level of achievements and that, in the long run, such grandiose praise as was lavished on you, would not serve you well. (Continued…)
Kevin
posted 4/14/08 @ 12:30 PM EST
You are ignorant. The reason that the SAT does not work is not that it can be used as a logical test of aptitude, but because it can be gamed by those who can afford the tools to game it. (Continued…)
Pinkie
posted 4/15/08 @ 1:22 AM EST
I agree. Mediocrity is so mediocre. We have come to accept it and make excuses for it instead of allowing the natural inclination to excel to allow us to do just that. (Continued…)
EK
posted 5/13/08 @ 6:03 PM EST
you are [wrong]. seriously how does one test equal how well you will do in college. retarded. who says that if you don't do well on the SAT's that you wont try harder and study harder in college? . (Continued…)
Post a Comment