Progressive point: Hypocrisy anchors the Hillary lifeboat

The anvil of conservative malfeasance has walloped the average American so many times now that it's perhaps understandable that pollsters find so many voters crying not "uncle" but "Hillary." The tentative "Anyone But Bush" slogan of 2004 crescendoed in 2006 and now, gathering momentum every news cycle, is poised to launch the famous first lady back into the White House. After eight years of wars, lies and corruption, the electorate doesn't seem to mind much who rescues them as long as it happens soon.

But it is important to recognize that not all lifeboats are created equal. In fact, Sen. Clinton's boat in particular warrants a closer look before jumping in.

For one, the same hands responsible for so much of what's wrong with Washington today built it. Conviction takes a back seat to calculation; courage is trumped by ambition. Mark Penn, long a fixture on the Clinton scene and now the candidate's top strategist, wastes little time asking what is right.

When not preaching his brand of poll-driven politics, his consulting firm Burson-Marsteller also works on shielding corporate criminals (such as the Blackwater mercenaries) from justice. Penn, who signed onto the odious Joe Lieberman for President 2004 campaign, is notorious for cajoling Democrats into supporting the Iraq war because it would supposedly prove politically popular.

Terry McAuliffe, another Clinton insider (whom Students for Hillary are bringing to AU), is part of the same problem. Channeling Republican bigot Tom Tancredo, McAuliffe's been on an anti-immigrant harangue - these people shouldn't be coming in this country, he says - just as the demographic has swung back into the Democratic fold.

While Sen. Clinton may be a genuine progressive, bringing in these triangulating, corporate consultants is not what is going to heal this country. When she can't give a straight answer on torture or war with Iran, when leadership is reduced to ducking hard questions on Social Security and taxes, one can't help but insist we do better.

Another Clinton presidency would be substantively bad for Democrats. Under Bill Clinton's watch, the party lost seats in both chambers of Congress while piling up huge debt and letting state parties decay. And while I don't doubt Hillary Clinton would make a strong general election candidate, I am also convinced that down-ticket Democrats in competitive districts would be at a disadvantage with her as the face of the party.

Continued...

Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

• Name: (required)
• Email: (required)
• NOTE: Email address will not be published
• Website:

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Email notify will not work because you are not currently logged in.
Click here to quickly login or create a free account.

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I am not posting spam. I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.