News
Prez search not comparable with GWU's timeline
By Jimm Phillips on 2/1/07
The time line used by George Washington University during its recent presidential search should not be compared to the one American University is using in its own search, according to Presidential Chief of Staff David Taylor.
"I think each institution has different needs and different goals," he said. "Every institution is going to have a different pace."
Taylor also said members of the AU community should not be concerned about the length of time the university is taking to choose its next president.
"The search is underway and that there is a time line that brings the committee through the spring," he said. "They have an established process for this, and a consultant has been hired. One shouldn't read much into taking too long; this is just the pace that we've got for our search."
According to the time line posted on the presidential search Web site, the board of trustees expects to make a final decision on a candidate in May and make a formal announcement of its choice by June.
Mike Lucibella, a junior in the School of Communication, said he wasn't surprised by the length of time AU has spent on its presidential search.
"It's to be expected," he said. "Anything this university does will take a while because of the bureaucracy involved. But even though we haven't had a permanent president for a while now, we've done well. I'd rather the committee take its time and not rush into a decision. If they rushed into a decision, we might end up with someone who's like Mr. Ladner."
AU's board of trustees fired President Benjamin Ladner Oct. 10, 2005, following an investigation into his alleged misuse of university funds. Ladner later agreed to resign in exchange for a $3.75 million severance package. On July 10, 2006, the board of trustees announced it was forming a Presidential Search Committee. On Sept. 25, 2006, the Committee formally met for the first time. The university's search continues, the Eagle previously reported.
"I think each institution has different needs and different goals," he said. "Every institution is going to have a different pace."
Taylor also said members of the AU community should not be concerned about the length of time the university is taking to choose its next president.
"The search is underway and that there is a time line that brings the committee through the spring," he said. "They have an established process for this, and a consultant has been hired. One shouldn't read much into taking too long; this is just the pace that we've got for our search."
According to the time line posted on the presidential search Web site, the board of trustees expects to make a final decision on a candidate in May and make a formal announcement of its choice by June.
Mike Lucibella, a junior in the School of Communication, said he wasn't surprised by the length of time AU has spent on its presidential search.
"It's to be expected," he said. "Anything this university does will take a while because of the bureaucracy involved. But even though we haven't had a permanent president for a while now, we've done well. I'd rather the committee take its time and not rush into a decision. If they rushed into a decision, we might end up with someone who's like Mr. Ladner."
AU's board of trustees fired President Benjamin Ladner Oct. 10, 2005, following an investigation into his alleged misuse of university funds. Ladner later agreed to resign in exchange for a $3.75 million severance package. On July 10, 2006, the board of trustees announced it was forming a Presidential Search Committee. On Sept. 25, 2006, the Committee formally met for the first time. The university's search continues, the Eagle previously reported.
2008 Woodie Awards

Be the first to comment on this story